The persons who take part In the performance of any act or who are directly interested in any affair, contract, or conveyance, or who are actively concerned in the prosecution and defense of any legal proceeding. U. S. v. Henderlong (C. C.) 102 Fed. 2; Bobbins v. Chicago, 4 Wall.
More...
The persons who take part In the performance of any act or who are directly interested in any affair, contract, or conveyance, or who are actively concerned in the prosecution and defense of any legal proceeding. U. S. v. Henderlong (C. C.) 102 Fed. 2; Bobbins v. Chicago, 4 Wall. 672, 18 L. Ed. 427 r Green v. Bogue, 158 U. S. 478, 15 Sup. Ct. 975, 39 L. Ed. 1061; Hughes v. Jones, 116 N. Y. 67, 22 N. E. 446, 5 L. R. A. 637, 15 Am. St Rep. 386. See also FABTT. In the Roman civil law, the parties were designated as "actor" and "reus." In the common law, they are called "plaintiff" and "defend-ant^;" in real actions, 4idemandant" and "tenant;" in equity, "complainant" or "plaintiff** and "defendant ;u in Scotch law, "pursuer" and "defender;" -in admiralty practice, "libelant" and "respondent;" in appeals, "appellant" and "respondent," sometimes, "plaintiff in error" and "defendant in error; in criminal proceedings, "prosecutor" and "prisoner." Classification* Formal parties are those who have no interest in the controversy between the immediate litigants, but have an interest in the subject-matter which may be conveniently settled in the suit, and thereby prevent further litigation; they may be made parties or not, at tbe option of the complainant. Chadbourne v. Coe, 51 Fed. 479, 2 C. C. A. 327.-ATece*-sary parties are those parties who have such an interest in the subject-matter of a suit in equity, or whose rights are so involved in the controversy, that no complete and effective decree can be made, dUposing of. the matters in issue and dispensing complete justice, unlaw they are before the court in such a manner as to entitle them to be heard in vindication or protection of their interests. See Chandler v. Ward, 188 111. 322, 58 N. E. 919; Phoenix Nat. Bank v. Cleveland Co., 58 Hun, 606, 11 N. Y. Supp. 873; Chadbourne v. Coe, 51 Fed. 480, 2 C. O. A. 327; Burrill v. Garst, 19 R. I. 38. 31 Atl. 436; Castle v. Madison, 113 Wis. 346. 89 N. W. 156; Iowa County Sup'rs v. Mineral Point R. Co., 24 Wis. 132. Nominal parties are those who are joined as plaintiffs or defendants, not because they have any real interest in the subject-matter or because any relief is demanded as against them, but merely because the technical rules of pleading require their presence on the record. It should be noted that some courts make a further distinction between "necessary" parties and "indispensable*' parties. Thus, it is said that the supreme court of the United States divides parties in equity suits into three different classes: (1) Formal parties, who have no interest in the controversy between the immediate litigants, but have such an interest in the subject-matter as may be conveniently settled in the suit, and thereby prevent further litigation; (2) necessary parties, who have an interest in the controversy, but whose interests are separable from those of the parties before the court, and will not be directly affected bya decree which does complete and full justice between them; (3) in-ispensable parties, who not only have an interest in the subject-matter of the controversy, but an interest of such a nature that a final decree cannot be made without either affecting their interests or leaving the controversy in such a condition that its final determination may be wholly inconsistent with equity and good conscience. Hicklin v. Marco. 56 Fed. 552, 6 C. C. A. 10, citing Shields v. Barrow, 17 How. 139, 15 L. Ed. 158; Ribon v. Railroad ?Co.,. 16 Wall. 450, 21 L. Ed. 367; Williams v. Bankhead, 19 Wall. 571. 22 L. Ed. 184; Kendig v. Dean, 97 U. S. 425, 24 L. Ed. 1061. -Parties and privies. Parties to a deed or contract are those with whom the deed or contract is actually made or entered into. By the term "privies," as applied to contracts, is frequently meant those between whom the contract is mutually binding, although not literally parties to such contract. Thus, in the case of a lease, the lessor and lessee are both parties and privies, the contract being literally made between the two, and also being mutually bind' ing; but, if the lessee assign his interest to a third party, then a privity arises between the assignee and the original lessor, although such assignee is not literally a party to the original lease. Brown.
Less...